Skip to the directory
For fiction and nonfictionWriter's Toolbelt

Sources, not vibes

Elicit

ResearchFreemiumNonfiction

Finds academic papers and pulls out methods, samples, and findings into a table. Built for literature reviews, not for blog posts or vibes. A novelist researching a profession can use it; a nonfiction writer on a contested topic should. The extracted cell can still misread a paper, so the PDF remains the source.

Best for

Serious nonfiction, and research-heavy fiction that needs papers rather than the first Google result.

Pricing

Freemium. Free paper search with limits. Paid research plans add more extraction and systematic-review features.

Listing checked 14 October 2026. Plans move. The vendor's page wins an argument with this one.

Visit ElicitMore research tools

In-depth review

Elicit review

Last checked 14 October 2026 against the vendor's public pages. Prices and features change; check the vendor before you buy.

Writer's Toolbelt review

Elicit

An AI research assistant for systematic, evidence-heavy work: search, extract, report.

academic papers searchable (vendor figure)
Pro per user/month, annual
clinical trials indexed (vendor figure)

What it is

Elicit is "AI for scientific research". It searches "over 138 million academic papers and 545,000 clinical trials", produces fully cited research reports, and supports systematic literature reviews with custom data extraction. Its Research Agent gathers evidence across scientific databases, journals, public data and documents you upload, and creates cited artifacts such as reports, tables and slides.

Screenshot of Elicit's public home page
Elicit's public home page, captured 14 October 2026.

Who it's for

  • Nonfiction authors writing evidence-heavy books in health, science or policy.
  • Academic writers and PhD students doing literature reviews.
  • Writers with research teams that need extraction and screening at scale.

Novelists will rarely need it.

Key features in practice

  • Semantic search. You "don't have to know all the right keywords".
  • Research Reports. Structured reports with citations, generated from a question.
  • Systematic Literature Reviews on Pro, with "PRISMA-grade screening and extraction accuracy" on Scale.
  • Custom extractions from uploaded papers: pull the same fields (sample size, outcome, method) from many studies.
  • Zotero import, even on the free plan.
  • Explanations for AI answers and multiple output templates on Pro.
Screenshot of Elicit's public home page, scrolled further down
Elicit's public home page, scrolled further down, captured 14 October 2026.

Pricing (checked 14 October 2026)

Plan Price For
Basic Free Casual exploration; limited Research Agent and Reports; view sources; Zotero import
Pro $49 per user/month, billed $588 annually Systematic reviews, Routines, custom extractions
Scale $169 per user/month, billed $2,028 annually 5x usage, SSO/SAML, dedicated success team
Enterprise Talk to sales Custom data sources and templates

The page shows "Save 35%" (Pro) and "Save 39%" (Scale) for yearly billing. Check the monthly price on the vendor site.

Pricing at a glance

  • BasicLimited Research Agent and Reports
    Free
  • ProSystematic reviews, custom extractions
    $49/mo
  • Scale5x usage, enterprise security
    $169/mo
US$ per user per month on annual billing, as listed on elicit.com/pricing on 14 October 2026 (Pro $588/yr, Scale $2,028/yr). Enterprise is priced by sales.
Screenshot of Elicit's public pricing page
Elicit's public pricing page, captured 14 October 2026.

Using it as a writer

  1. Start with a precise research question, the way a reviewer would frame it: population, intervention, outcome.
  2. Generate a report, then read the top papers yourself.
  3. Build an extraction table for the studies that matter: sample sizes, effect sizes, caveats. That table becomes your chapter's backbone.
  4. Import your Zotero library so new and existing sources live together.
  5. Use Free for exploration, and pay for a month of Pro when you're writing the evidence-heavy chapters.

Strengths

  • Rigour: designed for systematic reviews, not quick answers.
  • Extraction tables save days of manual work.
  • Free tier and Zotero support.

Writer's Toolbelt editorial scores

Elicit scorecard

6.6/10

  • Source quality9/10
  • Depth (reviews and extraction)9/10
  • Ease of use7/10
  • Fit for fiction writers2/10
  • Value for a solo writer6/10
Editorial judgment by Writer's Toolbelt, not vendor data or user ratings. Scores are relative to other tools in this directory.

Weaknesses

  • Expensive for individuals next to Consensus.
  • Academic scope only.
  • Learning curve for review workflows.

How it compares

  • Elicit vs Consensus. Consensus is cheaper and faster for quick evidence questions. Elicit is deeper for structured reviews.
  • Elicit vs scite. scite focuses on citation context, showing whether later papers support or contrast a claim.
  • Elicit vs NotebookLM. NotebookLM works only on sources you upload. Elicit finds the sources for you.

Feature comparison

AI research tools compared

FeatureConsensusElicitScitePerplexityNotebookLM
Free planYesYesNoYesYes
Lowest listed paid priceYes$12Yes$49Yes$12Yes$17Yes$4.99
All paid tiers have published pricesYesYesPartlySome tiers: contact sales or check vendor sitePartlySome tiers: contact sales or check vendor sitePartlySome tiers: contact sales or check vendor site
Competes with ProseEngine (we disclose)NoNoNoNoNo
Derived from each review's pricing table (vendor pricing pages, checked 14 October 2026). Lowest price is per month (or per unit where stated) on the cheapest listed billing option. "Not listed" means the vendor page does not publish it; check the vendor site.

Verdict

Elicit is excellent if your book depends on reviewing a body of research carefully. For occasional fact-checks, Consensus or the free Basic plan is enough.

FAQ

Is Elicit free? The Basic plan is free with limited usage.

How much is Elicit Pro? $49 per user per month, billed $588 annually, as of 14 October 2026.

Does it work with Zotero? Yes. Zotero import is listed even on the free plan.

Sources

Nearby on the shelf

  • Drafting

    ChatGPT

    The general assistant most writers already have open. Useful for brainstorming, blurb variants, and line rewrites if you paste the scene and say what you want. It does not hold a novel together unless you build that memory yourself with projects or files, and it will invent sources if you let it.

    Best for Writers who want one flexible assistant and will bring their own outline, pages, and skepticism.

    FreemiumFiction and nonfiction

  • Drafting

    Claude

    A general assistant that writers often prefer for long passages, tone, and a calmer revision pass. Projects can hold notes and chapters you upload. It is still a chat, not a novel app: continuity across a whole book is only as good as the pages you put in front of it.

    Best for Drafting and revision when you want a careful reader more than a plot machine.

    FreemiumFiction and nonfiction

  • Research

    Consensus

    Searches scientific papers for what the evidence says about a question, and tries to show agreement rather than a single link. Good for 'does this claim hold up?' and a poor place to learn narrative craft. Read it as a map of a literature, then go to the studies that matter.

    Best for Nonfiction writers checking whether a popular claim survives contact with research papers.

    FreemiumNonfiction